Circular No.125/7/2010 - ST
F.No.354/35/2010-TRU
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Tax Research Unit
…..
North Block, New Delhi
30th
July, 2010
To
Chief Commissioners of Central Excise and Service Tax (All),
Director General (Service Tax),
Director General (Central Excise
Intelligence),
Director General (Audit),
Commissioners of Service Tax (All),
Commissioners of Central Excise and
Service Tax (All).
Madam/Sir,
Subject: Services
provided by state governments under Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS) --
regarding.
In the
recent past, instances have come to the notice of the Board, where field formations
have demanded service tax from State governments or their departments/
agencies, for providing certain services under the centrally sponsored schemes
(CSS). To cite an illustration, in the
case of the centrally sponsored National Biogas and Manure Management Program
operating under Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, State government agencies
were involved in setting up of bio-gas plants in villages. Certain expenses incurred by the State governments or their
departments/ agencies during the course of setting up of such bio-gas plants
were reimbursed by the central government by way of a grant under the CSS.
Jurisdictional service tax authorities demanded service tax from the State
government department/agency, saying that the reimbursements received by the concerned
State government department/agency (as service provider) are nothing but consideration
for installation and commissioning service received from the central government
(service receiver).
2. Implicit in
this service tax demand is an assumption that the relationship between Central
government and the State government is an equivalent of a relationship between principal
and the agent. This assumption is questionable as under administrative
arrangement, State governments are bound to implement the centrally sponsored
schemes on receipt of a grant. The fact that State governments are implementing
agencies for the Central government within the framework of CSS does not make
them service providers. Consequently, Central government cannot be taken as
service receiver. Grant released by the Central government under a centrally
sponsored scheme cannot be presumed as consideration for providing a taxable
service.
3. Levy and
collection of service tax on State government agencies/departments implementing
CSS under a central grant, is not legally tenable and therefore in such cases
service tax should not be demanded.
4. Trade
Notice/Public Notice may be issued to the field formations.
5. Please acknowledge receipt of this Circular. Hindi
version follows.
(J. M. Kennedy)
Director (TRU)
Tel: 011-23092634