Home
||
Export Import
Policy & DGFT matters
||
Customs
matters ||
Central Excise matters ||
Shipping and Logistics Information
ieport.com - India's Premier portal on EXIM matters
Customs Notification
No-48/2005 dated 19.5.2005
Anti-dumping duty on import of Acrylic Fibre from Germany & Bulgaria withdrawn
(sub-heading 5501.30 or 5503.30)
G.S.R. (E).- WHEREAS in the matter of import of
Acrylic Fibre (hereinafter referred to as the subject goods), falling under
sub-heading 5501.30 or 5503.30 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act,
1975 (51 of 1975), originating in, or exported from, UK, Germany, Bulgaria and
Brazil (hereinafter referred to as subject countries), the designated authority
vide its final findings notification No.42/1/2001-DGAD dated the 27th August,
2002,, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section I,
dated the 27th August, 2002, has come to the conclusion that-
(a) the subject goods have been exported to India from subject countries below
its normal value;
(b) the Indian industry has suffered injury;
(c) the injury has been caused by the dumped imports from subject countries;
And whereas on the basis of aforesaid final findings of the designated
authority, the Central Government had imposed anti-dumping duty vide
notification of the Government of India in the erstwhile Ministry of Finance and
Company Affairs (Department of Revenue) No. 104/2002-Customs, dated the 9th
October, 2002, published vide G.S.R. 690(E), dated the 9th October, 2002 in Part
II, section 3, sub-section (i) of the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, dated the
9th October, 2002;
And whereas the designated authority, vide its mid-term review findings
notification No. 15/18/2004-DGAD dated 7th April 2005, published in the Gazette
of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section I, dated the 8th April 2005, has come
to the conclusion that-
(a) Acrylic fibre has been exported to India from Germany and Bulgaria below its
normal value; however, the exports from U.K. were not below the normal value and
were thus not being dumped. There was no evidence of dumping from Brazil. There
is no likelihood of recurrence of dumping from Brazil and UK;
(b) the domestic industry has not suffered material injury as a result of
dumping from Germany and Bulgaria;
(c) there is no likelihood of recurrence of injury in case the antidumping duty
imposed on import from subject countries is withdrawn;.
and has recommended withdrawal of anti dumping duty on imports of acrylic fibre
originating in or exported from the subject countries;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (5)
of section 9A of the said Customs Tariff Act, and rule 23 of the Customs Tariff
(Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped
Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, the Central Government,
hereby rescinds the notification of the Government of India in the erstwhile
Ministry of Finance and Company Affairs (Department of Revenue), No.
104/2002-Customs, dated the 9th October 2002, published vide G.S.R. 690(E),
dated the 9th October, 2002 in Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) of the
Gazette of India, Extraordinary, dated the 9th October 2002, except as respects
things done or omitted to be done before such rescission.
[F.No.354/223/2001-TRU]
(V. Sivasubramanian)
Deputy Secretary to the Government of India