ieport.com - India's Premier portal on
Indian Customs matters
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customs Circular No. 10/2006 dated 14.2.2006
Warehousing – Waiver of interest on Customs duty on warehoused goods –
consolidated instructions - regarding
Attention is invited to the
guidelines/instructions contained in Board’s letters/circulars
F.No.475/82/92-LC, dated 27.12.1993, Circular No.57/2000-CUSTOMS, dated
07.07.2000 (F.No.475/6/99-LC), Circular No.62/2004-Cus., dated 29.10.2004
(F.No.473/07/2004-LC), Circular No.38/2005-CUSTOMS, dated 28.09.2005
(F.No.473/07/2005-LC) in the matter relating to waiver of interest on Customs
duty on warehoused goods.
2. A need was felt in the Board to combine all these instructions into one
consolidated circular on the aforesaid matter to ensure uniformity to consider
the request for waiver of interest on Customs duty on any warehoused goods u/s
61 of the Customs Act, 1962. Accordingly, in supersession of these previous
guidelines and circulars on the aforesaid matter, the instructions have been
consolidated in this Circular.
3. Notification No.122/2004-CUSTOMS (NT), dated 25.10.2004 was issued,
delegating powers of the Central Board of Excise and Customs relating to waiver
of interest charged on Customs duty on warehoused goods, to the Chief
Commissioners of Customs and Central Excise enhancing the monetary limit from
Rs.15 lakhs to Rs.2 Crores under Section 61 of the Customs Act, 1962. However,
all requests for waiver of interest on Customs duty on warehoused goods first be
received at the Commissionerates who should examine the request. Such cases,
where amount of interest is within the delegated powers of Chief Commissioner of
Customs, need not be referred to the Board, and the same may be decided on
merits and in accordance with the following guidelines and existent
instructions. However, in case, the request falls beyond the delegated powers of
the Chief Commissioner of Customs, the same may be forwarded to the Board with
comments for consideration. It is desirable that the following guidelines are
kept in mind while deciding or recommending the cases for waiver of interest, to
ensure certain amount of uniformity in approach.
4. The guidelines where the interest would generally be waived have been framed
keeping in mind the fact that for certain specified categories of imports such
as ship stores and others, the import duty is finally not payable. In certain
other cases, it was considered that in view of the production programme or
nature of activity of the importers such as Ship Building Industry, Power
Generating Project, the imported goods have to be generally retained for a
longer period of time. Charging of interest would escalate the costs
unnecessarily. In essence the guidelines cover the following cases. This would
however be subject to the individual merits of a case :-
(i) Goods supplied as ship stores/aircraft
stores
(ii) Goods supplied to diplomats
(iii) Goods used in the units operating under manufacture-in-bond scheme
(iv) Goods imported by 100% EOUs
(v) Goods warehoused and sold through duty free shops
(vi) Machinery, equipment and raw materials imported for building and fitment
to ships
(vii) Petroleum products
(viii) Plant and Machinery imported for projects
(ix) Machinery, equipment and raw-materials imported for manufacture and
installation of power generation units
(x) Goods imported under OGL and warehoused for subsequent clearance against
valid advance licences/Import-Export Pass Book Scheme or any similar scheme
(xi) Goods imported in bulk by canalizing agencies/public sector trading or
service agencies and warehoused for subsequent release for export production
(xii) Imports under EPCG Scheme
(xiii) Import of Capital Goods by Public Sector Undertakings
5. In respect of cases at 4 (i) and (ii) above,
the waiver of interest is normally to be considered only after ex-bond clearance
of goods for the said purpose. For cases at 4 (iv), the waiver of interest shall
be considered on completion of the export obligation period and for cases at 4
(vi), the waiver of interest shall be considered only after the imported goods
have indeed been cleared from the warehouse for actual use for building and
fitment to ships.
6. The issue as to whether interest in case of export of warehoused goods under
Section 69 of the Customs Act, 1962 is payable in terms of the guidelines
contained in Board’s letter F.No.475/82/92-LC, dated 27.12.1993 OR whether the
same is not required as per Hon’ble Supreme Court’s judgement in the case of M/s
Pratibha Processors Vs U.O.I., as reported in 1996 (88) E.L.T. 12 (SC), has also
been examined in the Board. It has now been decided by the Board to adopt the
ratio of Hon’ble Supreme Court’s judgement in the case of M/s Pratibha
Processors Vs. U.O.I (1996 (88) E.L.T. 12 (SC), wherein the Apex Court has held
that the interest on warehoused goods is merely an accessory of the principal
and, if the principal is not recovered/payable, so is the interest on it. The
interest under Section 61 (2) of the Customs Act, 1962 has, thus, no independent
or separate existence.
7. In all cases, which have been discussed in the para 4 above, the demand for
interest are to be raised when due. The same are, however, not to be enforced,
and on fulfillment of the purpose of import, the waiver of interest is to be
decided within six months. In other words, the activity of the importers is to
be allowed to continue, which includes clearance of the goods from the warehouse
for the purpose of use, and only at the last stage after the goods have been
cleared or at the time of de-bonding in cases of 100% EOUs, the waiver of
interest issue is to be decided. This approach is necessary since, by and large,
the interest demanded may finally merit waiver and the importer should be spared
the hardship of first paying the interest and then, on waiver, seeking refund.
8. Cases which are not covered by the guidelines mentioned in para 4 above
should be referred to the Board for decision. Similarly, cases relating to
interest accrued on scrap generated during the manufacturing activity of 100%
EOU should not be decided by the Chief Commissioners. These should be referred
to the Board for decision.
9. The contents of this Circular may be brought to the notice of all the field
formations and the Trade under your jurisdiction.
F.No.473/07/2005-LC
Yours faithfully,
(T.K. Bandyopadhyay)
UNDER SECRETARY (LC)