www.ieport.com
Customs Circular No.61/2002 Date 20/09/2002
Levy of penalty under section 114A of Customs Act, 1962 – Clarification-
regarding.
It has been reported that a number of show cause notices
were issued proposing the demand of not only duty, but also interest payable in
terms of provisions of para 128 of the Hand Book of Procedures (1st April, 1993
– 31st March, 1997). While the Show Cause Notices have quantified/specified the
amount of duty, the interest to be demanded has not been specified, although
demands have been raised. It has been reported that in all such cases, penalty
under section 114A is being imposed equivalent to the amount of duty which
stands determined on the date of adjudication order. The Board has been
requested to clarify as to whether mandatory penalty imposed under section 114A
of the Customs Act, 1962 would be equal to the amount of duty or it would be
equal to duty plus interest. Section 114A provides for levy of penalty equal to
the duty or interest payable by a person in cases involving collusion or any
willful mis-statement, or suppression of facts by the said person. Conjunction
“or” in section 114A seems to be creating confusion at the field level.
2. The matter has been examined in consultation with the Ministry of Law. The
Ministry of Law, has stated that Maxwell’s Interpretation of Statutes (p-229)
while dealing with conjunctions “or” and “and” provides that -
“To carry out the intention of the legislature, it is occasionally found necessary to read conjunctions “or” and “and” one for the other.”
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in a case reported AIR 1957 SC p.699 State of
Bombay vs. R.M.D.Chamarbougwala also read the word “or” as “and” to give effect
to the clear intention of the legislature. In view of this, the Ministry of Law
is of the view that to carry out the intentions of the legislature, it is
occasionally found necessary to read the conjunction “or” and “and” one for the
other. A Constitutional Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in a case reported in
AIR 1963 SC p.1638 T.S.Govindlalji Maharaj vs. State of Rajasthan has also
observed that sometimes “or” must mean “and” as has been mentioned vide para 39
of the said judgment. A copy of the Ministry of Law’s opinion is enclosed.
3. In view of the above, it is clarified that penalty under section 114A of the
Customs Act, 1962 should be equivalent to duty and interest. The above-said
clarification may kindly be kept in mind while imposing the penalty under
section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962.
4. The contents of the Circular may be brought to the notice of all concerned by
way of issuing suitable Standing Orders. Kindly acknowledge receipt of the
Circular.
Yours faithfully,
(D.S.Garbyal)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
F.NO.437/9/98-CUS.IV