www.ieport.com
Customs Circular No.12/2002 dated 12/02/2002
References received from the Field Formations without the approval of
Commissioner of Customs Concerned.
Central Board of Excise & Customs, Department of Revenue, has
the overall administrative control over the Customs & Central Excise field
formations spread all over India. However, being a part of the Central
Government, Ministry of Finance, it also frames various rules and regulations
under the Customs Act. The field formations, on the other hand, implement the
policies, rules and regulations framed by the Central Board of Excise & Customs.
2. The Directorate of Drawback, which is a part of the Central Board of Excise &
Customs, among other things, is involved in formulation and notification of All
Industry Rates of Duty Drawback, covering more than 800 export products. The
field formations are expected to examine the export goods for classifying the
same, with reference to various drawback entries (SS Nos.) of the Drawback Table
and allow drawback rates specified therein.
3. The Board lays down the policy only, and its interpretation rests with the
field formations and the assessing officers posted therein. In case of any
dispute or doubt, the established office procedure requires that the case be put
up in writing to the adjudicating authorities, who in turn, should pass
appealable Speaking Orders so that the exporters can prefer appeal before the
Commissioner (Appeals). In those cases where the junior officers feel that the
guidance of the superior officers or any discussion is necessary for resolving
the issue, the files are to be put up to the superior officers including
Commissioners of Customs.
4. Commissioner of Customs are competent to resolve the issue as to the
interpretation of policy/rules/regulations and the Customs Act, which may arise
in their jurisdiction. Only such issues shall be referred to the Board which
involve substantial question of law/policy and/or having wide ranging revenue
implications and which in the opinion of Commissioners of Customs, the
indulgence of the Board in formulation of a uniform policy/practice is
necessary.
5. It has, however, been experienced that officers in the rank of Deputy
Commissioner/Assistant Commissioner and even Appraiser/Superintendent have been
sending references to the Board along with the sealed samples of the
consignments blandly seeking clarification as to the classification of the goods
in question under various entries of the Drawback Table. This is highly
irregular. This leads to avoidable harassment of the trade thereby adversely
impacting the exports.
6. It is clarified here that any reference to the Board can be made only by the
Chief Commissioner of Customs or the Commissioner of Customs.
7. Any deviation from the above mentioned arrangement should be viewed seriously
and action may be taken against the Assessing Officers/Adjudicating Authorities.
8. It has also been observed that the exporters are discouraged to approach the
senior officers in the field formations and they are instead directed to seek
clarification directly from the Directorate of Drawback. This tantamounts to
incompetence in taking the decisions which the field officers are normally
expected to take under the law. Further, this also results in needless increase
in the work of the Directorate of Drawback. In the present regime of
facilitation of trade, the exporters should be given sympathetic audience and
this is required to be impressed upon the field officers. It should be
endeavored to dispose of the cases in the Field itself by adopting the
prescribed legal procedure instead of referring the same in a routine manner to
the Board.
9. Suitable standing orders for guidance of the staff and trade may kindly be
issued accordingly.
10. The receipt of this Circular may kindly be acknowledged.
*******