ieport.com - India's
Premier portal on EXIM matters
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Circular No-819/16/2005-CX
dated 13.10.2005
Stream-lining departmental response to Supreme Court matters – Instructions
You are aware that Board has issued instructions from time to time regarding the response of the department concerning litigation before the Supreme Court. Your attention in this regard is invited to Board’s circulars below:-
i) Circular No.313/29/97-CX, dated 6.5.1997
issued vide F.No.390.107/97-JC.
ii) Circular No.402/35/98-CX dated 9.8.1998 issued vide F.No.390/107/97-JC.
iii) Circular No.710/26/2003-CX dated 23.4.2003 issued vide
F.No.390/198(M-2)12002-JC.
iv) Circular No.746/62/2003-CX dated 22.9.2003 issued vide
F.No.390/85/2003-JC.
2. It is reiterated that the Commissioner should examine every CESTAT order passed for his jurisdiction and on arriving at a view that the order should be appealed before the Supreme Court non law point involving rate of duty or valuation, the Commissioner shall submit a detailed proposal giving grounds for appeal and all related documents, namely the following:-
i) Copies of SCNs along with relied upon
documents;
ii) Copy of Order-in-Original/Order-in-Appeal
iii) Certified copy of CESTAT order indicating date of receipt by the
Commissioner along with appeal Paperbook;
iv) Board’s instructions, if any;
v) Copies of relied upon decisions in the CESTAT order along with their
status; and
vi) Any other relevant document
The said proposal should be sent to the Board, by name to the Joint Secretary
(Review), Central Board of Excise & Customs, 4th Floor, ‘B’ Wing, HUDCO –
Vishala Building, Bhikaji Cama Place, R.K Puram, new Delhi – 110 066 in the
proforma prescribed (copy enclosed at Annexure-I) within 10 days from the date
of receipt of the certified copy of the CESTAT order in Commissioner’s office.
3. As regards filing of Special Leave petitions, Civil Appeals against the
orders of High Courts passed in writ petitions filed by the parties or appeals
filed by the Department or by the assesses, Legal Cell has issued the following
circulars from time to time:-
(i) D.O. Letter F.No.275/45/91-CX.8A dated
26th June, 1991
(ii) Letter F.No.275/14/97-CX.81-A dated 13th February, 1997
(iii) Letter F.No.275/51/2004-CX.8A dated 13th August, 2004.
In addition to the documents prescribed in
paragraph 2 above, all documents filed during the proceedings before the High
Court, namely writ petition, copy of the appeal under Section 35G or 130A,
reply/re-joinder filed, if any, interim order(s) passed, miscellaneous
application filed during the course of the hearing etc., should be sent along
with the proposal. In Criminal matters, documents seized, statements recorded,
if any and other relevant documents prepared during the course of the
investigation in vernacular should be accompanied by proper English translation
duly authenticated by a gazetted officer not below the rank of an Assistant
Commissioner certifying the correctness of the translation correctness of the
translation. It has been the grievance of the officers of the Board that the
documents received from the field formations are often illegible and, therefore,
care should be taken to send legible copies of the documents.
4. It has also been brought to the notice of the Board, that the proposals for
appeal before the Supreme Court against the High Court’s orders are initiated on
the strength of the copy of the order circulated by the Court on its own motion
without applying for the certified copy. The limitation prescribed under the
Supreme Court Rules in such matters are calculated from the date of the order
and is 90 days for filing SLP against an order passed in a writ or a writ appeal
and 60 days for filing a civil appeal against an order of the High Court in an
application filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or Section
130A of the Customs Act, 1962 as the case may be. Therefore, all proposals
should be initiated within 10 days from the date of the order on the strength of
an ordinary copy of the order without waiting for the certified copy from the
High Court. The procedure for obtaining the certified copy should be initiated
immediately on pronouncement of the judgment, preferably the date of
pronouncement of the order or the day after, and the original certified copy may
be sent thereafter. All proposals for filing SLP/ Appeal against the orders of
the High Court should be addressed by name to the Director (Legal), Central
Board of Excise and Customs, 5th Floor, ‘C’ Wing, HUDCO - Vishala Building,
Bhikaji Cama Place, R.K. Puram, New Delhi -110066.
5. You are also aware that the limitation prescribed for filing a Civil Appeal
before the Supreme Court is 60 days and the same for SLP is 90 days from the
receipt of the order. In this context, the need for expeditious and the same
time judicious examination of the order that is proposed to be appealed against,
is emphasized. A flowchart along with time allocations is enclosed. This
flowchart will be initiated at the level of the Commissioner’s Office, and shall
constitute an essential part of the file throughout its movement. In the event
of any delay beyond allocated time, the concerned person delaying the matter
will give an explanation for the said delay at the time of onward movement, with
dated signature on the flowchart. This may be strictly adhered to by all
concerned. Necessary instructions on this should be issued and copy endorsed to
this office.
6. Kindly acknowledge receipt.
F.No.390/101/2005-JC
(Kailash Sethi)
Member (L&J)
ANNEXURE - 1
PROFORMA
COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS/REPORTON TRIBUNAL ORDER
1. | NUMBER AND DATE OF THE TRIBUNAL ORDER | |
2. | DATE OF RECEIPT IN THE COMMISSIONERATE | |
3. | ISSUE INVOLVED BEFORE THE BENCH. | |
4. | FACTS OF THE CASE. | |
5. | TRIBUNAL'S DECISION ON THE ISSUES INVOLVED BEFORE THE BENCH | |
6. | ARE THERE ANY MINISTRY'S / BOARD'S INSTRUCTIONS INVOLVED (PLEASE GIVE THE REF. NO. CBEC DIGEST REF. NO. ETC.) | |
7. | IS THERE ANY EARLIER ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL AND ACTION TAKEN | |
8. | IS THERE ANY SUPREME COURT'S JUDGEMENT OF THE ISSUES INVOLVED | |
9. | WHETHER THE DECISION HAS A RECURRING EFFECT WITH RESPECT TO THE CURRENT TARIFF. | |
10. | GROUNDS FOR PREFERRING APPEAL | |
11. | REVENUE INVOLVED IN THE MATTER (DEMAND / REFUND). | |
12. | WHETHER REVENUE IMPLICATION HAS RECURRING EFFECT OR NOT | |
13. | WHETHER ANY REFUND ACCRUESAT A RESULT OF THE CESTATE ORDER. |
ANNEXURE - II
|
||||
ò |
ò |
|||
ò |
ò |
|||
ò |
ð ò |
|||
ò |
ò |
|||
ò |
ï |
|
||
ò |
||||
ò |
||||
ò |
||||
ò |
ñ |
|||
ò |
ñ |
|||
|
ð |
|