Notification No. 134/ 2008-Customs
dated 22.12.2008
Anti dumping duty on import of vitrified and porcelain tiles, other than
vitrified industrial tiles from China and United Arab Emirates (6907 or 6908 or
6914)
Whereas in the matter of imports of vitrified and porcelain tiles, other than
vitrified industrial tiles (hereinafter referred to as the ‘subject goods’),
falling under headings 6907 or 6908 or 6914 of the First Schedule to the Customs
Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), originating in or exported from the People’s
Republic of China (China PR) and United Arab Emirates (UAE) [hereinafter
referred to as the subject countries] and imported into India, the designated
authority in its sunset review final findings No.15/17/2006-DGAD, dated 21st
April, 2008, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section
1, dated the 23rd April, 2008, had inter alia come to the conclusion that-
(i) there was no dumping taking place from UAE;
(ii) the subject goods were likely to enter Indian market at dumped prices from
China PR, should the present measures be withdrawn;
(iii) in spite of the anti-dumping measures in place, there existed significant
current injury to the domestic industry. There was also no evidence on record to
suggest that dumping or the injury to the domestic industry would cease to exist
or was not likely to recur in case the anti-dumping duties were discontinued;
and had considered it necessary to recommend continued imposition of the
anti-dumping duty on the subject goods originating in, or exported from, China
PR in order to remove injury to the domestic industry;
And whereas, on the basis of the aforesaid findings of the designated authority,
the Central Government had imposed an anti-dumping duty on the subject goods
vide notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance
(Department of Revenue), No.82/2008-Customs, dated the 27th June, 2008,
published in Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i)
vide number G.S.R. 485(E) of the same date;
And whereas, M/s Foshan Lihua Ceramics Co. Ltd., China PR (producer), M/s Foshan
Henry Trading Company, China PR (exporter) through M/s Anjaneya Trading PTE
Ltd., Singapore (exporter) have requested for review in terms of rule 22 of the
Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty
on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 in respect of
exports made by them, and the designated authority vide new shipper review
notification No.15/23/2008-DGAD, dated the 11th November, 2008, published in the
Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section 1, dated the 11th November,
2008, had recommended provisional assessment of all exports of the subject goods
made by the said M/s Foshan Lihua Ceramics Co. Ltd., China PR (producer), M/s
Foshan Henry Trading Company, China PR (exporter) through M/s Anjaneya Trading
PTE Ltd., Singapore (exporter) till the completion of the new shipper review;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (2) of rule 22
of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping
Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury), Rules, 1995, the
Central Government, after considering the aforesaid recommendation of the
designated authority, hereby orders that pending the outcome of the said new
shipper review by the designated authority, vitrified and porcelain tiles, other
than vitrified industrial tiles, falling under headings 6907 or 6908 or 6914 of
the First Schedule to the said Customs Tariff Act, produced by M/s Foshan Lihua
Ceramics Co. Ltd., China PR and exported by M/s Foshan Henry Trading Company,
China PR through M/s Anjaneya Trading PTE Ltd., Singapore, when imported into
India, shall be subjected to provisional assessment till the new shipper review
is completed.
2. The provisional assessment may be subject to such security or guarantee as
the Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs, as the
case may be, deems fit for payment of the deficiency, if any, in case a
definitive anti-dumping duty is imposed retrospectively on completion of
investigation by the designated authority.
3. If the designated authority recommends anti-dumping duty after completion of
the said new shipper review, the importer shall be liable to pay the amount of
such anti-dumping duty imposed on all imports into India of the subject goods
from M/s Foshan Lihua Ceramics Co. Ltd., China PR (producer) and M/s Foshan
Henry Trading Company, China PR (exporter) through M/s Anjaneya Trading PTE Ltd,
Singapore (exporter), from the date of initiation of the said new shipper
review.
F.No.354/214/2001-TRU (Pt.III)
Sd/-
(Unmesh Wagh)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
ieport.com - India's Premier portal on Customs matters